Bulldozer justice: Supreme Court asserts executive can't become judges

In a strong rebuke to the use of "bulldozer" demolitions, the Supreme Court on Wednesday firmly criticized the executive for bypassing judicial processes and targeting citizens' homes based solely on accusations of criminal activity. Emphasizing constitutional protections and the principle of separation of powers, the top court issued strict guidelines to curb such demolitions and warned of severe consequences for errant officials engaging in overreach.

Also Read: Bengaluru: Bulldozer razes shops on pavements, as also livelihoods!

The Supreme Court was hearing petitions seeking to halt demolitions used as punitive measures against accused individuals. Highlighting the judiciary’s primacy, the Court stated that "no one can be held guilty without a fair trial." Arbitrarily demolishing homes without due legal process, it added, undermines the rule of law and constitutional principles.

In a warning to government authorities, the court asserted that the executive cannot assume the judiciary’s role. Such actions, especially in the absence of judicial orders, threaten foundational legal norms. The Court further noted that officials who exceed their authority must be held accountable, signaling a move towards greater scrutiny of executive actions.

The judgment aims to reinforce safeguards within criminal law that protect all individuals, including accused or convicted persons, from abuses of power. “Officials cannot act in such an arbitrary manner,” the Court emphasized, underscoring the need for adherence to due process and legal propriety.