Darshan had sought permission for homemade food

He is in Parappana Agrahara serving judicial custody

HC sends matter to magistrate court

Darshan, a key accused (A2) in the high-profile Renukaswamy case, faced a legal setback as the Karnataka High Court denied his request for homemade food while in judicial custody. Darshan, currently held in Parappana Agrahara, approached the court seeking permission for homemade meals, arguing for his dietary needs.

Also Read: Actor Darshan to extend financial aid to Renukaswamy’s family after release on bail

During the hearing, the prosecuting lawyer acknowledged that while food is indeed a fundamental right, the provision of homemade food is not. The lawyer posed a practical concern, questioning what would happen if all 5,000 undertrials and prisoners sought permission for homemade food. This argument highlighted the logistical challenges and potential inequities such a provision could create within the prison system.

In response, the High Court advised Darshan to take his plea to the magistrate court for further consideration, directing that the matter should be resolved at that level. The court’s decision underscores the principle that while prisoners’ rights are protected, special privileges like homemade food are not guaranteed under current legal frameworks.

Darshan’s co-accused, Pavitra Gowda, designated as A1 in the case, remains central to the ongoing investigation. The Renukaswamy case has garnered significant attention, and the legal proceedings continue to be closely monitored.

This ruling sets a precedent for other inmates seeking similar requests, reinforcing the need for uniformity and fairness in the treatment of all prisoners. The decision reflects the court’s balance between safeguarding fundamental rights and maintaining order and practicality within the prison system.