Former SC judge flags non-adjudicatory deputations as barrier to clearing case backlog

Former Supreme Court judge Justice RV Raveendran has raised serious concerns over the growing trend of deploying judges to non-adjudicatory roles, warning that such practices are worsening India's already staggering case backlog.

Also read: Study highlights gender disparity in Karnataka High Court with only 14%-17% women judges

Addressing a gathering at the Karnataka Judicial Academy recently, Justice Raveendran highlighted that in several states, between 15% and 30% of judicial officers from the district and sessions courts are engaged in administrative or quasi-legal assignments rather than adjudicating cases. He cautioned that the frequent diversion of judges from core courtroom responsibilities is detrimental to the judicial system's efficiency.

He emphasized the need for high courts to critically assess the impact of such deputations, which include postings in law departments, as tribunal registrars, or as secretaries of legal service authorities. According to Justice Raveendran, these roles, while important, take judges away from their primary function—dispensing justice.

The event, attended by members of the judiciary, legal scholars, and students, served as a platform for broader reflection on judicial responsibilities. Justice Raveendran also stressed the moral duties associated with judicial office, reminding attendees that judges must act as stewards of justice rather than wielders of power.

His remarks come amid nationwide calls to address delays in court proceedings, with India’s judiciary facing a massive pendency of cases across all levels.