UGC’s equality rules spark nationwide protests

UGC’s Equality Rules‑2026 mandate committees in all colleges to curb caste bias. Protests erupt as upper‑caste groups oppose, resignations follow, while govt assures no misuse; Supreme Court to decide on the controversial notification.

author-image
Archana Reddy
UGC
Advertisment
  • Every college/university must form equality committees
  • Upper‑caste groups oppose the rules
  • Centre assures fairness, while a petition in the SC will decide the rules’ fate

UGC’s Equality Rules‑2026 mandate campus committees to curb caste bias; protests erupt, resignations follow, govt assures fairness, Supreme Court to decide

In a landmark move to curb caste‑based discrimination in higher education, the University Grants Commission (UGC) has introduced the Promotion of Equality in Higher Educational Institutions Rules‑2026. The notification, issued on January 15, mandates every university and college to establish an Equality Committee, but the decision has triggered widespread protests and political turmoil across the country.

Aim of the New Rules
The UGC’s initiative follows a series of tragic incidents, including the suicides of Rohith Vemula and Payal Tadvi in 2025, which highlighted the deep‑rooted caste bias in campuses. Acting on Supreme Court directions, the rules seek to ensure equal opportunities and a safe environment for all students. Each Equality Committee must include representatives from SC, ST, OBC, women, and persons with disabilities. Their responsibilities include addressing caste‑related complaints within a fixed timeframe, promoting awareness, implementing schemes for disadvantaged students, and fostering inclusivity on campuses.

Rising Opposition
Despite its intent, the notification has sparked strong resistance, particularly from upper‑caste groups. Many students have staged demonstrations, claiming the rules could create fresh divisions rather than bridge existing gaps. The controversy escalated after Bareilly City Magistrate Alankar Agnihotri resigned in protest, followed by the resignation of 11 BJP leaders in Lucknow. These developments have intensified the debate, with critics warning of potential misuse of the provisions.

Also Read: After CMS heist, ₹1.3 crore ATM cash vanishes: Hitachi Payment Services staff pull off major fraud in Bengaluru

Government Response
As protests spread across universities, the central government finally broke its silence. Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan assured that the rules are designed to protect vulnerable students and will not be misused. He emphasized that no student, regardless of background, would face discrimination under the new framework.

Awaiting Supreme Court Verdict
While the UGC insists the rules are essential to safeguard dignity and equality in higher education, opponents remain unconvinced. A petition challenging the notification has already reached the Supreme Court, placing the final decision in the judiciary’s hands. For now, the rules stand as both a progressive step toward social justice and a flashpoint of political and social contention in India’s academic landscape.

Also Read: Major crackdown on defence liquor smuggling in Bengaluru

Supreme Court Supreme Court of India University Grants Commission (UGC)
Advertisment