Public outcry over commissioner Dayanand’s suspension sparks 'I Stand With Dayanand' campaign

author-image
Chaitanyesh
Updated On
Public outcry over commissioner Dayanand’s suspension sparks 'I Stand With Dayanand' campaign
Advertisment
  • Suspension of officer Dayanand faces massive online and public backlash
  • Netizens praise his leadership; demand suspension order be revoked
  • Public campaigns highlight flaws in government decision-making

The state government's sudden decision to suspend senior police officer DCP  Dayanand has drawn widespread public criticism, both offline and online. Citizens, activists, and even retired officials have questioned the move, calling it premature and unfair in the absence of a proper investigation.

Also Read:‘Punished for doing our duty?’ Officers express anguish over suspensions in Bengaluru stampede case

Social media platforms are abuzz with hashtags like #IStandWithDayanand and #JusticeForDayanand, as netizens express their solidarity with the officer known for his swift decision-making, discipline, and timely responses during critical situations. Many pointed out that during the RCB celebration chaos in the city, Dayanand was actively coordinating crowd control efforts, and did not deserve to be scapegoated for administrative lapses allegedly triggered by poor event planning.

Critics argue that suspending a capable officer without detailed inquiry not only demoralizes the police force but also sets a dangerous precedent. Several posts on social media highlighted his previous contributions to civic policing and his pro-public attitude, praising him as “a rare, responsible officer in uniform.”


">June 5, 2025

Offline too, voices of dissent are rising. Public forums and civic groups have appealed to the government to reconsider the suspension, warning that blaming the police alone for the stampede-like chaos is unjustified when event organisers violated crowd regulations.

As the #ReinstateDayanand campaign gains momentum, pressure is mounting on the administration to review its decision and restore faith in transparent governance.

Advertisment