/newsfirstprime/media/media_files/2026/02/14/bengaluru-swami-vivekananda-school-2026-02-14-16-32-05.jpg)
Court directs strict action after NewsFirst reveals unauthorized relocation, safety lapses, and large-scale violations by Sri Sahakara Education Society-run Vivekananda School in Bengaluru.
In a major setback for Swami Vivekananda School, run by Sri Sahakara Education Society, the Karnataka High Court has issued strong directions to education authorities after serious irregularities in the school’s operations were exposed by NewsFirst.
The case stems from a detailed investigative report aired by NewsFirst on September 17, 2024, which revealed that the school had illegally shifted its campus without obtaining mandatory permissions from the Education Department and local authorities. The school was originally permitted to operate from building number 1350 in A Block, Sahakara Nagar. However, it was unlawfully relocated to BBMP Khata numbers 33/2 and 33/3 at Kothihosahalli village, NTI Layout, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, without approval.
Despite lacking building shifting licenses, safety clearances, and official sanction, the school continued operations and admitted over 1,300 students, raising serious concerns about student safety and regulatory violations. The NewsFirst report highlighted that the institution ignored repeated notices and continued functioning in violation of Karnataka Education Act provisions.
Following the broadcast, the Deputy Director of Public Instruction (DDPI) and Block Education Officer (BEO) conducted inspections, confirming the unauthorized relocation. This led to the issuance of notices, registration of an FIR, and a show-cause notice directing the school to shut down. Authorities cited violations under Section 41(5) of the Karnataka Education Act, 2006, which mandates prior approval for any relocation of registered educational institutions.
Challenging the Education Department’s show-cause notice, the school approached the Karnataka High Court through Sri Sahakara Education Society president Chandrashekar. However, the court refused to grant relief and instead directed education officials to proceed strictly as per law.
The High Court instructed Chandrashekar to personally appear before the BEO and submit all relevant documents. It further directed the BEO to examine the materials submitted and take appropriate legal action. The court also emphasized that education authorities must ensure compliance and protect student safety, especially when large-scale admissions are involved.
The case also exposed alleged inaction by officials, including multiple DDPI and BEO transfers, with accusations of delay despite repeated notices and inspection findings. The court’s intervention now places firm accountability on the authorities to conclude the inquiry and act decisively.
/newsfirstprime/media/agency_attachments/2025/07/28/2025-07-28t111554609z-2025-07-23t100810984z-newsfirst_prime_640-siddesh-kumar-h-p-1-2025-07-23-15-38-10-2025-07-28-16-45-54.webp)
Follow Us