Darshan arrest: Actress Ramya retweets post advocating Section 302 of IPC which calls for life imprisonment for murder

Share :

Published June 11, 2024 at 5:08pm

Update June 11, 2024 at 5:13pm

    Actress Ramya has publicly commented on the incident

    She retweeted a post expressing support for Renukaswamy's family

    Highlighted legal consequences for Darshan under Section 302 of IPC

In a shocking turn of events, renowned Sandalwood actor Darshan has been arrested in connection with the brutal murder of Renukaswamy. The arrest, which includes actress Pavitra Gowda and 12 others, has sent shockwaves through the Kannada film industry and left fans in disbelief.

The murder case revolves around the tragic death of Renukaswamy, a fan of Darshan hailing from Chitradurga. Allegedly, Darshan and his associates brutally assaulted Renukaswamy, resulting in his death. The deceased’s body was later found near the Sumanahalli drain. This case has not only raised questions about Darshan’s future but also brought the darker side of celebrity culture into the spotlight.

Also read: Darshan assaulted Pavitra Gowda herself, after coming to know of Renukaswamy’s death!

Actress Ramya, also known as Mohaka Taare, has publicly commented on the incident. She retweeted a post expressing support for Renukaswamy’s family and highlighted the potential legal consequences for Darshan under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This section stipulates that anyone found guilty of murder is liable to face the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a fine.

Ramya’s vocal stance on the issue contrasts with her previous support for Darshan when miscreants threw slippers at him. She had then advised fans to maintain decorum and respect. Now, her support for the victim’s family underscores the gravity of the allegations against Darshan.

As the investigation continues, the film industry and the public await the court’s decision, which could see Darshan facing severe legal repercussions. The case remains a grim reminder of the potential consequences of unchecked celebrity influence and violence.

Darshan arrest: Actress Ramya retweets post advocating Section 302 of IPC which calls for life imprisonment for murder

https://newsfirstprime.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ramya1.webp

    Actress Ramya has publicly commented on the incident

    She retweeted a post expressing support for Renukaswamy's family

    Highlighted legal consequences for Darshan under Section 302 of IPC

In a shocking turn of events, renowned Sandalwood actor Darshan has been arrested in connection with the brutal murder of Renukaswamy. The arrest, which includes actress Pavitra Gowda and 12 others, has sent shockwaves through the Kannada film industry and left fans in disbelief.

The murder case revolves around the tragic death of Renukaswamy, a fan of Darshan hailing from Chitradurga. Allegedly, Darshan and his associates brutally assaulted Renukaswamy, resulting in his death. The deceased’s body was later found near the Sumanahalli drain. This case has not only raised questions about Darshan’s future but also brought the darker side of celebrity culture into the spotlight.

Also read: Darshan assaulted Pavitra Gowda herself, after coming to know of Renukaswamy’s death!

Actress Ramya, also known as Mohaka Taare, has publicly commented on the incident. She retweeted a post expressing support for Renukaswamy’s family and highlighted the potential legal consequences for Darshan under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). This section stipulates that anyone found guilty of murder is liable to face the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a fine.

Ramya’s vocal stance on the issue contrasts with her previous support for Darshan when miscreants threw slippers at him. She had then advised fans to maintain decorum and respect. Now, her support for the victim’s family underscores the gravity of the allegations against Darshan.

As the investigation continues, the film industry and the public await the court’s decision, which could see Darshan facing severe legal repercussions. The case remains a grim reminder of the potential consequences of unchecked celebrity influence and violence.

Load More