Investigation deepens in Renukaswamy murder case: Reasons why police custody was extended for Darshan

Share :

Published June 20, 2024 at 7:26pm

    Accused A2, A9, A10, and A14 have not responded properly to investigation

    Police authorities seized Rs. 37,40,000 from the accused’s house

    Accused A14 Pradosh played a crucial role in destroying evidence

Even as investigation deepens in Renukaswamy murder case, here are reasons why police custody was extended for Darshan according to remand application. The court extended the police custody of A2 Darshan and three other accused by 2 more days till Saturday, 22nd June.

Also read: Renukaswamy murder case: A2 Darshan back to police custody while A1 Pavitra Gowda sent to judicial custody

  1. Non-Cooperation from Key Accused: Accused A2, A9, A10, and A14 have not responded properly during the investigation, hiding issues related to the act. Further investigation is deemed necessary.
  2. Cash Seizure: On June 19, 2024, authorities seized Rs. 37,40,000 from the accused’s house. An additional Rs. 3,00,000 given by the accused to his wife was also suspended on the same day. Records are being collected.
  3. Suspicious Activities: Accused A2 approached several individuals post-incident. The motive behind these interactions needs to be explored in his presence.
  4. Evidence Destruction: Accused A14 Pradosh played a crucial role in destroying evidence and has not been cooperating with the investigation. He allegedly transported another accused to the crime scene and further interrogation is necessary.
  5. Concealed Purchase Information: Accused A9 has not disclosed the source of an electric charge torch used in the crime. Further questioning is required.
  6. Suspicious Movements: Accused A9 was seen visiting the crime scene with other individuals and should be further interrogated.
  7. Mobile Evidence: Critical evidence was found on the mobile phone of accused A10. The person who sent this information needs to be questioned in A10’s presence.
  8. Witness Tampering: Workers at the crime scene have reportedly been lured to prevent them from testifying. The accused’s connection to this activity needs to be investigated.
  9. Financial Cover-Up: Accused A2 allegedly gave Rs. 5,00,000 to accused A16 through A10 and A13 to cover up the crime. Accused A16 then passed the money to a friend.

The investigation continues as authorities work to uncover the full extent of the involvement of all accused individuals in Renukaswamy murder case.

Investigation deepens in Renukaswamy murder case: Reasons why police custody was extended for Darshan

https://newsfirstprime.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/DARSHAN-38.webp

    Accused A2, A9, A10, and A14 have not responded properly to investigation

    Police authorities seized Rs. 37,40,000 from the accused’s house

    Accused A14 Pradosh played a crucial role in destroying evidence

Even as investigation deepens in Renukaswamy murder case, here are reasons why police custody was extended for Darshan according to remand application. The court extended the police custody of A2 Darshan and three other accused by 2 more days till Saturday, 22nd June.

Also read: Renukaswamy murder case: A2 Darshan back to police custody while A1 Pavitra Gowda sent to judicial custody

  1. Non-Cooperation from Key Accused: Accused A2, A9, A10, and A14 have not responded properly during the investigation, hiding issues related to the act. Further investigation is deemed necessary.
  2. Cash Seizure: On June 19, 2024, authorities seized Rs. 37,40,000 from the accused’s house. An additional Rs. 3,00,000 given by the accused to his wife was also suspended on the same day. Records are being collected.
  3. Suspicious Activities: Accused A2 approached several individuals post-incident. The motive behind these interactions needs to be explored in his presence.
  4. Evidence Destruction: Accused A14 Pradosh played a crucial role in destroying evidence and has not been cooperating with the investigation. He allegedly transported another accused to the crime scene and further interrogation is necessary.
  5. Concealed Purchase Information: Accused A9 has not disclosed the source of an electric charge torch used in the crime. Further questioning is required.
  6. Suspicious Movements: Accused A9 was seen visiting the crime scene with other individuals and should be further interrogated.
  7. Mobile Evidence: Critical evidence was found on the mobile phone of accused A10. The person who sent this information needs to be questioned in A10’s presence.
  8. Witness Tampering: Workers at the crime scene have reportedly been lured to prevent them from testifying. The accused’s connection to this activity needs to be investigated.
  9. Financial Cover-Up: Accused A2 allegedly gave Rs. 5,00,000 to accused A16 through A10 and A13 to cover up the crime. Accused A16 then passed the money to a friend.

The investigation continues as authorities work to uncover the full extent of the involvement of all accused individuals in Renukaswamy murder case.

Load More